Elections Have Consequences....
Words cannot describe how angry I am as well as how we all should be at this
attack on us as postal/federal employees. Any APWU member who cast a ballot for
the GOP candidate in November's election has no one but themselves to blame if
this pile of steaming crap becomes the law of our land.
This bill represents a 5.2% increase in retirement contributions with no
increase in benefits. Do the math - subtract 5% from your yearly base and think
over the course of a career how much you could have saved or what you could have
done with that money. For a level 6 Step O that’s nearly a $2,900.00 a year
increase in the contribution to your retirement – with no additional increase in
your benefit. That’s money you could have put toward your TSP, in your kids
college fund, towards a car payment…
This bill represents a 12+% increase in what we currently pay for our health
care. It will also remove the contribution levels we currently pay as a
negotiating tool for the APWU at the HQ level - so in addition to attacking your
paycheck again - this attacks our rights to collectively bargain. Add 12% to
your current bi-weekly health plan payment and see what that costs you.
I lay this legislation at the feet of the GOP and all those working people and
union members who supported them in Novembers election.
Those Democrats who couldn't be bothered to show up and vote last November need
to take a hard look at what this legislation represents as well.
The GOP has never hidden their anti-worker agenda whether at the Federal or
State level and going back to APWU President Bill Burrus and his statements that
as soon as the GOP union busters finish with the others they would get to us -
well welcome to the future. Kudos to the House Democrats who stood firm (all of
them) and Kudos to Justin Amash the House Rep. from the west side of MI who
broke ranks with the remaining GOP'ers in MI and voted no. Thanks as well to the
26 Republicans who supported us and voted no as well. Sisters and brothers -
Elections have consequences and those short sighted members of the APWU who
either voted for the GOP or who sat on their backsides not bothering to vote at
all - well look in the mirror when your paycheck gets slashed as a result of
this crap piece of legislation, our apathy and our misguided loyalty will only
serve to further erode our ability to support ourselves and our families.
We all work way too hard to continue to vote against our ability to earn a
living. Elections have consequences and this, is only the beginning of the
attacks on postal/federal employees.
480-481 Area Local
House Passes Budget Targeting Postal, Federal Workers
The measure passed 219-208. All but 26 Republicans voted YES; every Democrat
voted NO. How they voted:
View final vote results for roll call 141
On Wednesday evening, March 25, the House of Representatives approved a budget
bill that targets the earned health and retirement benefits of postal and
federal employees. House Concurrent Resolution 27 passed the House by a 219-208
vote. The measure hits Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) contributions,
the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
(FEHBP). In addition, the budget bill suggests changes to mail frequency and
type of delivery.
Pensions: The budget bill proposes to
require members of the federal and postal workforce who participate in the
Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) to make a greater annuity
contribution. The budget bill assumes the
use of the equal-share proposal embraced in the 2010 National Commission on
Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (aka Simpson-Bowles Commission); that is, a 6
percent contribution rate by FERS participants. Currently, most
FERS participating NAPUS members contribute 0.8 percent towards their annuity.
Retirement Savings: The budget bill
proposes to lower the interest rate earned on Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
contributions into the G-Fund. The G-Fund invests in special short-term Treasury
securities. Since its inception in 1987, the G Fund has earned an average
annualized rate of return of 5.43 percent. The budget proposal would have the
effect of reducing the rate of return to about 0.01 percent, according to the
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
Health Benefits: A perennial cost-cutting
proposal has been the replacement of the current Federal Employees Health
Benefits Program (FEHBP) contribution formula with a fixed-dollar voucher,
adjusted annually to the consumer price index (CPI). Presently, the employer
contribution is based upon the weighted average premium of all FEHBP plans. As a
result, health care inflation is taken into account when adjusting employee
premium contributions. The net impact of the proposed change would be to shift
about $127 billion, over the next
decade, from the government onto the backs of federal and postal employees and
retirees. A second proposal that would impact FEHBP premium contributions is
longevity-based retiree health plan contributions. And, finally,
the budget proposes that USPS contributions on behalf of its employees be the
same level as provided to federal employees. Postmasters already pay the same
share of premium as federal employees; so, this proposal would impact postal
employees covered by collective-bargaining agreements that provide for a higher
Postal Operations: The House budget
proposal references the adoption of unspecified changes to the “frequency and
type of delivery.” It should be assumed that the budget is promoting five-day
delivery and a move towards centralized or curbside residential mail delivery.
Late Thursday, the Senate was still considering its budget bill, Senate
Concurrent Resolution 11. Senate Budget Committee Chair Michael Enzi (R-WY)
introduced it. Over 640 amendments to the bill were filed and we expect
votes on about one-quarter of them. Significant cuts are assumed in the Senate
budget measure and would impact our benefits; however, the legislation did not
identify those cuts.
View the original article on the PostalReporter site.
Election Results 2015
March 6, 2015
There were 1,924 members in good standing who were mailed ballots,
851 ballot envelopes
were picked up from the Post Office Box # 20340 in Ferndale, Michigan
at 1:00 PM, March 6, 2015 by the Election Committee. A count of
837 ballot envelopes
were duly certified by the Election Committee. Of those,
7 'Reply Envelopes'
were received with the 'identifying' name label removed and therefore,
deemed not legal, 16
ballots were deemed ineligible for various reasons.
7 Envelopes were improperly
sorted into our box and were returned to the Ferndale Post Office.
Final Tally Results
Maintenance Craft Directorr
Pontiac Installation Director
Royal Oak Installation Director
Download a PDF flyer for posting.
480-481 Area Local Officers
The following is a lost of all nominees for office as they will appear on the ballot.
This notice must be posted at each installation of the APWU 480-481 Area Local on the
Union bulletin board.
Download a PDF flyer for posting.
We Need A New Strategy
Hello Sisters and Brothers,
Having attended a few rallies fighting for America’s postal service as well as for Walmart workers to get a living wage I was hopeful as I always am that
the cause for which so many braved the chilly temps would prevail. The local press has been kind to us all, and as such I was hopeful that this might
resonate with the average American citizen and as such turn itself into grass roots support for our cause and then the local populace would join us a
partners defending what is theirs. I was very happy at the show of solidarity by all those in attendance on 11-14-14 out in front of the Royal Oak Main
PO, nearly 100 + from far too many unions to count braved the cold weather to support our cause and whether it was on 11-14-14 in Royal Oak as we tried yet
again to save the USPS from itself or on 11-28-14 out in front of a Walmart as we joined others to fight for a living wage. I congratulate and thank each
person who came out for their leadership as well as their clear understanding of the peril we are all in.
It pains me to say that I have lost confidence that Congress will help us in our efforts to save this centuries old service, I now ponder the future with a
dread that often comes before having a filling done.
My skull has that dull ache that comes with knowing we are on the verge of changes that will forever alter the landscape of the postal service and will do
nothing except erode the public’s confidence in us as an agency that despite weathering horrific mismanagement, a coopted and corrupt leadership, still
manages with regularity to get the job done for the American people. The bargaining unit is the heart and soul of an organization that is destroying itself
I spent the Thanksgiving weekend reading various articles from across the nation opining as to the state of organized labor here in the USA. One specific
article suggests that current model that is organized labor may well have run its course.
Watching accomplished leaders like the AFL-CIO President Richard Trumpka give commentary looking for the bright spot in Novembers collapse makes me wonder
at times as to the reality he is living in and to that end if the author Thomas Geoghegan maybe on to something. As for what happened in early November
there is no bright spot, there is no silver lining, all there is a political landscape that has been hijacked by the big money donors that are hell bent to
make certain theirs is the only voice heard in the workplace and in Congress.
I will have to begin question President Trumpka’s leadership if he does not sit quietly down with the other national leaders in organized labor and consider
if as a movement we do not need to make fundamental structural changes in how we market ourselves the masses. The GOP was not selling an idea – the were
selling apathy and encouraging people to disengage from the process. Whether its shifting voting rules to deny people their right to vote, or whether its
overtly lying about the damage they have done to this economy and job market people seemed to buy into it. When I see that in our own state the Nerd got
another term after he pretty much in plain view shoved the tax burden of this state onto to me and you as well as retirees while giving those NON JOB
CREATORS a tax break, well my head is still spinning and all I can do to maintain my sanity is begin to prepare for the next national election that is now
just 23 months away.
The article below scratches the surface of where I believe we need to begin. It mentions that a series of one day strikes can be used as a means to disrupt
unruly employers and shame politicians into supporting a pro labor agenda.
I recall in the 1970’s how the “strike” was a powerful tool against an employer who refused to bargain. I watched as working people held a line and risked
their lives to keep others from crossing it. Well in the last 40 years not only the times but the laws as well as people's resolve and commitment to their
fellow middle class brothers and sisters has changed. Any extended walk out usually results in the employer hiring scab labor that seems all too willing to
cross a picket line and take the scraps or crap the employer is offering.
This is not by chance – it’s the result of anti-labor money and anti-labor politicians stacking the deck against the middle class over the course of the
last 5-6-7 decades. We need a new strategy and I believe the author below is on to something. Imagine if you will a series of one day strikes all across
this nation in different sectors at different times against different employers. What if the entire employee complement at every department store in
Michigan took the day after Thanksgiving off, just one massive sick out. Think of the message that would send.
Do not buy into the message that the minimum wage is an entry level wage that only young people earn, come to one of those rallies to raise the minimum wage
and see who is actually getting paid, the agenda in a right to work state is to drive down wages and increase profits, it is no more complicated than that.
There are other thought provoking items in the article below and at the risk of spoiling it for you all I will end with one quote, thank you for reading
this far and ask you continue just a bit further into Inthesetimes.com reporter Jeremy Gantz's piece on Tom Geoghegan's book - Only One Thing Can Save Us: Why Our Country Needs a New Kind of
“We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Justice Louis Brandeis
I hope you find it as thought provoking as I did.
Let Old Labor Die
With union membership declining, Tom Geoghegan has a radical prescription for labor.
By Jeremy Gantz
It is not difficult to imagine the United States without a labor movement. Less than 7 percent of the country’s
private-sector workforce is unionized. Twenty-four states have enacted
“right to work” laws that sap union treasuries by allowing workers to benefit
from union contracts without paying dues. Even Michigan became right-to-work in
Is labor’s decline terminal? Long-time labor lawyer Thomas Geoghegan says
yes—unless we redesign the legal system upon which the modern labor movement was
The title of Geoghegan’s new book, Only One Thing Can Save Us: Why Our Country Needs a
New Kind of Labor Movement (The New Press), signals a manifesto. Geoghegan
methodically builds his case around two arguments. First, for labor to make a
comeback, American workers must be less beholden to hidebound unions and the
federal National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the agency that referees union
elections and mediates labor disputes. Workers must have the opportunity to more
directly control their lives through workplace democracy.
Geoghegan’s second argument is that a new kind of movement can only be born
through new laws—which means the Democratic Party must return to its labor
roots. Geoghegan pleads with Democrats to do more than tinker with the minimum
wage and tout college diplomas. Given that most jobs being created in the United
States do not require a four-year degree, he argues, Democrats must foster a new
and stronger labor movement to combat rampant inequality.
Only One Thing Can Save Us is vintage Geoghegan: erudite, witty,
autobiographical and compulsively tangential. (He’s not shy about his love for
John Dewey and John Maynard Keynes.) There’s also some guilt. While running for
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s old Illinois congressional seat in a 2009 special
election, Geoghegan barely mentioned organized labor. He got clobbered (his
word) in the primary and now gives us this “act of expiation.”
Geoghegan churns out a book every three or four years, all while representing
embattled workers and unions (including the Chicago Teachers Union). He was
bound to return to the fate of the U.S. labor movement, having started there in
1991 with his first book, Which Side Are You On?: Trying to Be for Labor When
It’s Flat on Its Back.
Now labor’s back seems to be broken, and Geoghegan is tired of losing. The
ambivalence about unions (not to be confused with workers’ rights) that animated
Which Side Are You On? has become 11th-hour desperation. Outmatched by
union-busting employers in court and hobbled by the bottleneck of the NLRB,
organized labor’s last best hope is to conduct “political strikes” that force
deep change, he argues.
“To go up against employers with the idea of bringing labor back is futile,”
Geoghegan writes. “Yet if the real target is the Democratic Party and not the
employers, enough disruption, made up of little hit-and-run strikes, might
change the world.”
He advocates one-day strikes, concluded before employers can legally replace
workers, as a way to disrupt business-as-usual for employers and to shame
Democrats into pushing a pro-labor agenda. An example of the approach is the SEIU-backed Fight for 15
campaign’s fast-food worker strikes, which seem to have pushed a minimum
wage increase onto the Democratic agenda this year.
But Geoghegan is after more than wage boosts. “The goal is to build up to a
1968-style political fight to force the Democratic Party to sign on to a
revamping of corporate law,” he writes. The revamp would substitute a
“stake-holder” corporate model for our current one. In other words, follow the
lead of Germany, where labor power is baked into company operations through
“co-determined” boards of directors featuring elected employees and “works
councils” unaffiliated with any union that help manage local working conditions.
He explored such themes in his last book, Were You Born on
the Wrong Continent? How the European Model Can Help You Get a Life, which
declared his love for Germany’s labor relations and well-guarded industrial
Yet Geoghegan’s push for the stake-holder model has an air of unreality, and not
just because it’s nigh impossible to imagine Democrats altering the DNA of
American-style corporate capitalism. Importing the German labor-management model
would also change unions. Under current labor law, only an elected union
representing all workers can negotiate working conditions.
Geoghegan thinks this model alienates Americans who are looking for control
rather than solidarity—like “a guy in Alabama who deep down is waiting for a
labor movement that won’t be imposed on him.” So unions must surrender some
control, he writes, in a passage sure to anger some union officials:
The period of childhood or tutelage—the nature of it depends on which union is
the “parent”—has to end. In the century to come, new labor has to step back,
give up its control over the old labor law remedies, and let workers do things
Sounds great. But why would unions flex what little muscle they have left to
push for changes that undermine their own power—especially given what appears to
be long-term GOP control of the House and the Senate
filibuster. (The filibuster, Geoghegan notes acidly, “has always existed in
part to ensure a pool of either slave or low-wage labor.”) Mindful of
Washington’s perpetual gridlock, he suggests that state governments might first
experiment with amending the corporate model to boost workers’ power. For
example, they could give tax breaks to any company that allows employees to
elect half of its board of directors.
A more straightforward way to bolster the labor movement would be to amend the
Civil Rights Act to include the right to join a union. This would allow
individuals to bypass cumbersome NLRB procedures and sue anti-union employers in
federal court. Geoghegan is so confident that a civil right to unionize would
grow the movement that he proposes—if the filibuster isn’t abolished!—stomaching
a national right-to-work law in exchange for the amendment.
It is a troubling paradox that his vision for a new kind of movement—less
hierarchical and dependent on NLRB-certified elections and contracts—is so
predicated on government action. A New Deal Democrat, Geoghegan sees the modern
labor movement as a glorified federal policy project gone off the rails. It
began with Washington elites arming workers with legal tools, which have since
rusted into uselessness.
Apparently, then, the one thing that can really save us is a new kind of
Democratic Party. But as implausible as Geoghegan’s vision for labor—and the
Democratic Party—may be, its premise is right: Unions can only survive by
View the original article on the In These Times site.
Hello Everyone and Happy Thanksgiving!
I want to thank all those who came out to the rally in Royal Oak on 11-14-14. We
had well over 100 people from too many unions to count. APWU NBA James Stevenson
came to town to support us and I want to thank him personally for that. Rick
Blocker President of the Metro Detroit AFL-CIO was there and I thank him as well
– NALC Branch Pres. Paul Roznowski was there and again – if I try to thank
everyone individually I will forget someone so I want to thank all those who
braved the chilly weather and helped us raise public awareness of the attack on
America’s Postal Service.
I am happy to report that as of Friday November 14th, 2014 – all the Democrats
in the Michigan congressional delegation stand with us in supporting a moratorium
on these destructive delivery standard changes as well as the remaining plant
closures, no word on if and or when the GOP may get on the right side of this issue.
In keeping with the idea that an injury to one is an injury to all I am asking
that we all make it to the Walmart store located at 44575 Mound Road in
Sterling Hts. MI. on the Friday after Thanksgiving. This rally will be just one
of hundreds taking place all across the United States. I am asking that we show
up and support these workers like they showed up Friday and supported us.
Download a flyer with details of this rally
Read the entire story on the ThinkProgress site.
I hope we can count on your attendance to this very important Black Friday
480 481 Area L:ocal
It is with deep sadness that we must report the passing of former 480 481 Area
Local President Donna Ratkos-Mercier.
Donna was a mainstay of this union and this local, her hard work still impacts
the employees of this local and will for years to come.
Not a second was spent in her time as a member, steward and officer where she
was not trying to help her fellow union brothers and sisters or this union.
Donna truly believed an injury to one was an injury to all.
Our thoughts our prayers and our deepest sympathies go out to her family and her
The obituary can be viewed
In addition cards and condolences can be sent to the 480-481 Area Local at: 810
Livernois St. Ferndale, MI 48220, we will make sure her husband Mike and her family get