many of you are aware, the APWU and the USPS were unable to come to a
negotiated agreement, and once again we are headed to arbitration.
How we arrived at this point this year is another story entirely.
My perspective on the Rank and File and 1300 L Street:
I need to thank first of all Rank and File Committee Chair Scott Hoffman, Boston
Metro Area Local, our Vice Chair A.J. Jones Eastern Montgomery County PA Area
Local and our Secretary Doris Orr-Richardson President for the State of Florida
for all their leadership throughout the experience. Brother Scott kept us
focused, AJ provided much insight and Doris did the tireless job of recording
the vital information the committee needed as we conducted our business. All
three are exceptional local and state leaders in their own right, but they made
the APWU proud the way they lead this committee.
As members of this committee, the 13 of us that had the duty to determine
whether or not any tentative contract would be worthy to be given to the general
membership for a vote. I have to say I was very proud to serve in such a
capacity on the committee.
The committee spent nearly forty hours over several days both in DC and from
home via conference call reviewing numerous tentative agreements that made up a
possible new contract. The tentative agreement was presented to the committee by
President Dimondstein as an extension of the current contract. However, with so
many changes it seemed more like a new contract than an extension of the old
contract. So it was after scrutinous deliberation that a majority of the
committee rejected what President Dimondstein presented to us.
I regret that we were not able to vote to send the membership a tentative
agreement for consideration. I have stated several times that I have never been
on the winning side of any vote and felt so defeated. No one wants to go to
arbitration if it can be avoided.
While we as a committee have agreed to stay silent on the sticking points to
avoid tipping our hand to the USPS as we head to arbitration, I would like to
report to you some of my experiences as a member of this committee.
First, I have to say the future of this union looks very bright, the young
leaders on the committee showed we have a solid foundation for the future. There
was a great mix of young and older members each of us listening to the others as
we deliberated and debated the various aspects of the tentative agreement.
Truthfully, I expected the more experienced members of this committee to lead
and they did but what I witnessed time and time again was the younger members
stepping hard into this challenging process and more often than not directing
the conversation and focusing the deliberations.
I also expected that some of the members would be beholden to the officer that
picked them for the committee. However, what I saw was a majority of the
committee deliberating independent of who selected them; Instead focusing on the
deal in front of us and spending hours reviewing it as we sought to determine
how it may impact the decades to come plus the several hundred thousand current
and future APWU members. The simple truth is we were consumed by this assignment
and the importance of it.
Honestly, I witnessed a severe disconnect between our President and quite a few
other elected national officers.
The fact not one National Craft Officer or the Executive Vice President was
sitting at the head table during direct negotiations with the USPS was an
avoidable error by President Mark Dimondstein. Ultimately, it’s what I believe
led directly to some of the issues we just could not overcome when the committee
had to decide whether the tentative agreement was good enough to send to all of
you for an up or down vote.
I walked away from this experience seriously troubled by our national
president’s management style. We had several interactions with President
Dimondstein regarding our concerns over the agreement, and he was combative,
profane and disrespectful. I kept wondering if he feels comfortable being so
rude to one of the most critical committees this union has how does he interact
with the remainder of this union's other elected officers?
While I can understand Mark takes this personally, no one can spend days and
months working on something and not feel some serious ownership of it, but at
the end of the day, we all owe each other the respect we demand from postal
management and Mark’s behavior was simply unacceptable. The committee had a job
to do, and we did it, he minimally owed us the respect we gave him.
We have always heard that 1300 L Street is a politically charged environment but
what I took away from this experience was that’s it’s also a hostile workspace
and that hostility is driven by our national president.
We witnessed some of this at the national convention in Pittsburgh when
President Dimondstein overtly and publicly disrespected APWU National Executive
Vice President Debbie Szeredy by refusing to allow her to run the convention
when he stepped away for a break. That public display of disrespect left the
Michigan delegation as well as others ready to shut the convention down.
Mark's temper was in evidence again at the Presidents conference in Maine when
he disrespectfully lashed out at a local president when questioned about his
decision on a specific MOU.
As your local president, now in my third term, I try to leave local politics out
of the decisions I make. While I have supported other candidates in our
elections over the years, I make every effort to work with every elected board
member and chief steward in this local whether I supported their candidacy or
not; to do otherwise would be a violation of the oath I took to put this union
first in every decision I make.
I get up every day knowing the difficult task in front of me, and I know that I
do not have all the answers. I would never unilaterally embark on any serious
negotiation without the input of the officers, steward, and members impacted by
these negotiations. I believe President Dimondstein did just that, I think he
purposefully excluded the craft officers and the executive vice president from
the head table, and for reasons only he can explain he went forward with just
the counsel of the Industrial Relations Director Vance Zimmerman.
We are one of the more democratic industrial unions in this nation and what I
continue to see from our chief executive is behavior that is exhibited by those
who unilaterally believe they know what’s best and it is becoming clear that
Mark does not tolerate any form of dissent.
Dissent in our democracy is vital to its health; we are many voices from many
backgrounds all coming together for a single common purpose, to bust our butts
to ensure we have the best job security, decent wages, benefits, and work
Besides this article, I have sent President Dimondstein a personal letter
outlining my concerns with his treatment of the rank and file committee. I get
no pleasure out of any this especially since I have known Mark for most if not
all of my union life. I have considered him a friend, and I believed him to have
the qualities to be a great leader.
It is clear he can build coalitions outside this union, what’s also clear is
internally we have some pretty severe divisions, and it all starts and stops
with our chief executive.
We have an uncertain future, the polarization of our national politics has put
working people at the back of the line. Also, brothers and sisters, we cannot
tolerate such an epic level of dysfunction at 1300 L Street.
We have a national election coming up, it pains me to say this but if president
Dimondstein cannot unify this union from 1300 L Street on down, if he cannot
live the solidarity he preaches then we may well have to find another leader to
steer us through the difficult times ahead.
Leadership is hard, and decisions must be made. Then the explanations for those
decisions follow. What we cannot allow is a few at the top excluding the rest of
those elected craft officers, thinking they have all the answers.
We cannot voluntarily take one step backward; labor has sacrificed enough. If we
have to go to war with the USPS then we expect our chief officer to lead us into
battle, not attack us for disagreeing, not criticize or vilify us for having the
courage to speak truth to power - even if it's his.
All we have is each other, and at the end of the day I stand shoulder to
shoulder with the APWU, I do so proudly, I do so willingly, and I will speak
truth to power no matter who it is. We will disagree, elections will come, and
presidents will go. This exercise isn’t about me as your president; it’s about
what’s best for this union and its rank and file.
I challenge President Mark Dimondstein to go back and reread his oath of office,
bring the National Executive Board to the table, clear the air, and recognize
the decades of talent he has in that room. Perhaps then he will understand the
real power that comes from rising above the pettiness of politics and that when
unified we are a formidable force! It's time for President Dimondstein to quit
worrying about the next election and instead take us into arbitration and get us
the best damn contract he can. The membership deserves better.
Nothing about writing this article was easy, but it’s what I witnessed, and
sisters and brothers I stand by every word.
Roscoe Woods, President
480-481 Area Local
Support The Contract Campaign And Veterans
Sisters and Brothers,
We are less that two weeks from the expiration of our contract - the local has
shirts to sell for both our contract campaign as well as to show support for our
Veterans on RED Friday's.
The RED (Remember Everyone Deployed) Friday shirts are $10.00
The Blue Contract Campaign
shirts to be worn on Thursday's are available for $5.00
If you are in an associate office please send a check or money order to 810
Livernois St. Ferndale MI 48220 for the shirts you prefer indicating your
preferred size and we will get the shirts out to you. If you can please include
the shift you work so if we hand deliver them to you we know the best time to
reach you at work. Depending on the location we may mail them so please make
sure we have the correct mailing address for you.
At this time we have large, x-large, xx-large and xxx-large.
We have a few xxxx-large left and we have ordered some mediums.
The cash for the RED shirts goes to sponsor veterans events, the cost of the
Blue shirts will be kicked to the Membership Benefit Committee for any events
they are planning. These are great high quaility union made shirts at a great
price and they are going fast - for members outside our local the RED shirts
are available but the cost is $20.00 plus applicable postage. Give us a call and
once you tell us what you want we can tell you what the cost to mail them will
Hope to hear from you all soon!
480-481 Area Local
Download the APWU Gear Up! flyer as a PDF
President Trump Issues
Executive Order on USPS
Live and direct from the APWU HQ web site President Trump sets his sights on the USPS.
This is not good news.
The panel imposed by POTUS is not a big fan of the USPS.
Be prepared to counter what I suspect will be a lot of bad information being
disseminated if they determine they want to make wide sweeping changes to our
I expect this group to make serious recommendations that will undermine our
ability to collectively bargain. Keep your congressional representatives phone
numbers handy and stay tuned...
480-481 Area Local
President Issues Executive Order on USPS
APWU Web News Article #: 38-2018
04/13/2018 - President Trump has issued an Executive
Order to form a “task force” to evaluate the finances of the United States
Postal Service. Such evaluation will include pricing, policies and the costs of
The Task Force will be chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury, and comprised
of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Director of the
Office of Personnel Management as well as other department and agency heads the
chair may designate.
The Executive Order calls for a full report within 120 days to provide a
“thorough evaluation of the operations and finance” of the USPS to include:
- the expansion and pricing of package delivery
- the USPS role in competitive markets
- the decline in mail volume and implications of USPS financing
- the USPS monopoly over letter delivery and mail boxes
- the USPS business model, workforce, operations, costs and pricing.
The task force will potentially develop recommendations on administrative and
legislative reforms regarding the U.S. Postal Service.
The primary reason for the financial challenges facing the Postal Service is the
2006 Congressional mandate forcing the USPS to “pre-fund” retiree health
benefits 75 years into the future. This crushing burden is faced by no other
company or agency and is being used by those who wish to destroy the postal
“The APWU looks forward to working with anyone truly interested in maintaining a
vibrant public Postal Service for generations to come. If given the opportunity
to meet with the task force, we will forthrightly tell the truth, share our
views and promote the protection of the rights and benefits of postal
employees,” said APWU President Mark Dimondstein. “One step toward USPS
financial stability is to fix the pre-funding debacle by passing the bi-partisan
postal reform legislation currently stalled in both the House and the Senate.”
The new Executive Order is of real concern to the APWU and we will continue to
keep all members informed and up to date.
View the original article on the APWU website.
Download the Election Results as a PDF
Nominations for Local Officers
The nominations for 480-481 Area Local elected positions will take place at the
January 21, 2018 General Membership Meeting. Please
be sure to update your
mailing address if you have recently moved. If you are not
currently receiving the Communicator, it is a good indication that we have no
good address for you. The Local Constitution language governing the
nomination process is as follows:
Nominations and Elections
At the regular meeting in October of 2011, the nomination of officers shall be held, “However, beginning with the election 3 years after 2011, the nominating meeting shall be in January (2015, 2018, 2021, etc). The ballots shall be counted on the Friday prior to the March General Membership meeting. The term of the officers of this local shall be three years, except that those Officers elected in the year 2011, will serve three years and three months.” Elective offices shall be: President, Executive Vice President, Vice President, Secretary-Treasurer, Editor, Clerk Craft Director, Maintenance Craft Director, Motor Vehicle Craft Director, Legislative Director and Chief Stewards. Craft Directors shall be nominated and elected by their respective crafts. Chief Stewards shall be nominated and elected by the members of their respective installations.
A candidate must be a member in good standing according to the printout for DCO / Pay Period 19, 2011, P/P 25, 2014, 2017, 2020 etc. to run for office.
The nominating process shall begin after the reading of the minutes and
financial report. The nomination process shall be as follows. Any member
wishing to nominate a candidate shall stand and remain standing until called
upon; when called upon they shall state their name, craft and home installation;
they will then submit the name of the nominee for the office in question.
Self-nomination is permitted. Nominations shall remain open until every member
standing has had an opportunity to submit their candidate for nomination.
Nominations will not be official unless the candidate accepts the nomination by
the conclusion of the nominating meeting. The chair of the meeting will take
nominations for a specific office (President, Executive Vice President, etc.)
When the nominations for that office are closed, before going to the next
office, the chair will ask each person nominated whether they accept the
nomination. At that point, each candidate will say “I accept.” “I decline” or “I
defer until the end of the meeting.”
A candidate’s declaration to accept or decline is final, with one exception. If
subsequently nominated for another position, the candidate may accept the other
position and decline the position previously accepted (either when nominated for
the other position or by deferring that decision to the end of the meeting.
After nominations have been taken for all elective offices, the business of the
meeting shall resume. Prior to adjournment, the chair shall read back the names
of the candidates who deferred their decision. Candidates must accept or decline
at that point by writing down their decision and handing it to the Election
Committee Chair. The Chair will read all these responses aloud after everyone
has made their decision. Any candidate who accepts nominations for more than one
elective office shall be declared ineligible for all of them.
If a candidate is not present at the meeting, a signed statement from the
candidate accepting the nomination for a specific position will be accepted, if
presented by a member in good standing at the time the candidate is nominated.
A candidate who is unable to attend the meeting due to an emergency shall leave
a message on the answering machine at the Local Union Office no later 3:00pm the
same day, stating the position for which s(he) accepts nomination. After
this process is completed, all candidates may submit their commonly known name
as they wish it to appear on the ballot to the Secretary/Treasurer and the Chair
of the Election Committee. Immediately after the meeting adjourns, a blind draw
will be conducted by the Election Committee chair to determine the order in
which names shall appear on the ballot. Each candidate may observe or have an
observer during this process. Any candidate who calls in for an emergency will
be placed last.
Note: The constitution, in its entirety, is
available on this website. Go to 480-481 Documents and the
constitution is the first document listed.
Urgent Update - Amended (AGAIN) 7-24-17
The 480-481 Area Local has been getting calls regarding a number of issues that
deal with potential excessing in our local and this district, as well as calls
regarding impacts to full time jobs. To give you an idea how chaotic and ill
conceived these impacts are quite a few of the impacts that have been cancelled
were less than three weeks old, in fact I received the the previous impacts two
weeks ago this coming Friday. This agency is lost in the abyss and once again
the bargaining unit will bear the brunt of the uncertainty.
As noted at the last union meeting we have impact statements for:
- Post Office - # impacted
- Algonac - 1 PTF - Cancelled
- Almont - 1 PTF
- Bloomfield Hills - 2 FTR
- Capac - 1 PTF - Cancelled
- Carleton - 1 FTR
- Chelsea - 1 PTF
- Clawson - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Davisburg - 1 PTF
- Dearborn Hts - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Dearborn - 1 FTR
- Fair Haven - 1 FTR
- Grosse Ile - 1 PTF - Cancelled
- Hazel Park - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Highland - 1 PTF
- Keego Harbor - 1 PTF
- Lake Orion - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Marysville - 1 FTR
- Milford - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Mt Clemens - 4 FTR
- Post Office - # impacted
- New Baltimore - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- New Haven - 1 FTR
- Oxford - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Pinckney - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Plymouth - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Pontiac - 4 FTR
- Port Huron - 1 FTR
- Richmond - 1 PTF - Cancelled
- Rochester - 1 FTR
- Romulus - 1 PTF
- Royal Oak - 6 FTR
- Trenton - 1 FTR - Cancelled
- Union Lake - 1 PTF
- Utica - 3 FTR
- Walled Lake - 2 FTR
- Warren - 2 FTR
- Washington - 1 PTF
- Waterford - 1 FTR
- Wayne - 1 FTR
Seems you are all over staffed. I suspect your managers and supervisors will do
one of two things, ride you to work harder, or start doing the work themselves.
Either choice is unacceptable. Per the USPS normal manner of conducting business
most if not all of these impacts are filled with errors. We will review and take
appropriate measures to see these impacts are addressed, in a lot of cases the
impacts have been reached due to PTF transfer or PSE conversion. The flaws in
the data are extensive and its one more example of an agency that despite
millions of dollars spent automating their processes still having no idea who is
working and where they are working.
We have received notice of no other impacts for excessing in our local. If you
are approached by management in your office, or another management official
approaches you to talk about excessing, you need to call our office ASAP to
Additionally we have been approached by management at the Metroplex to discuss
once again the realignment of the work force in that facility. (Last realignment
was just under 3 years ago.)
We received a very loose draft of their proposal and since that date (June 30th,
2017) we have sent to them a request for information so we might better
understand how they are arriving at the decisions they are proposing to make.
Rumors being what they are we expect that once this plan is finalized we can
address the details but at this point what we have is a proposal and they have
never made public what is proposed. They have provided some of the requested
information and we are waiting for the rest.
At the heart of our discussion now is how management determines what an "earned
hour" is. Their entire proposal is based on something called the Function 1
Scheduler and it determines the alignment and staffing of assignments by using
It is very difficult for your union to offer any meaningful input when we have
no idea how the service is reaching its conclusions.
They have yet to provide for our review where the PSE complement will be
utilized. Unless we know for certain how many PSE's and where and what hours
they are working it’s very difficult to discuss what is proposed.
Additionally we are all aware that management has created this situation by
their eliminating jobs en masse through the reversion process.
Once we have a clearer picture of what will be happening we will make it a point
to get on all tours and all sections to inform our membership.
480-481 Area Local
480-481 Area Local, APWU
& VFW Post 4659
Sunday September 17, 2017
Cracklewood Golf Course
18215 24 Mile Road — Macomb, MI 48042
• 7:30 Check-in ~ 8:30 Shotgun Start
• Cost is $90.00 per person - $360.00 per team
Make checks payable to VFW Post 4659
• 18 Hole - 4 Person Scramble
(Includes hot dog, chips, and beer or pop at the turn and Buffet Dinner)
Proceeds to Benefit the Veteran's Programs for Both Organizations
Limited spaces available so sign up early
For details see www.apwu480.org or VFW Post 4659 Clubroom
email@example.com with your questions.
Hole sponsorships are available - Starting at $75.00
50/50 Raffle - Door Prizes and much more
Deadline is August 25th
Click here for a PDF flyer and application.
Get the Facts
Postal Reform Questions & Answers
APWU Web News Article #: 34-2017
04/10/2017 - In order to have a healthy, sustainable, public Postal Service,
legislation is necessary to protect postal customers and postal workers from
USPS’s current financial crisis. The bi-partisan Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act (PAEA) of 2006 largely caused this crisis, sending the Postal
Service on a severe downward spiral. The PAEA mandated the Postal Service
“pre-fund” 100 percent of its retiree health benefit liabilities, 75 years into
This absurd, unfair and unsustainable burden, which costs the Postal Service
$5.5 billion each year over the past decade, is a large reason why the Postal
Service cut back service and hours of operation, closed processing plants,
increased subcontracting and severely reduced staffing. It also hurt the Postal
Service’s financial ability to upgrade buildings, update infrastructure and
purchase a new vehicle fleet.
In the ten years since the passage of the PAEA, legislators from both the Senate
and House of Representatives repeatedly introduced postal legislation. Some
bills, such as H.R. 22 in 2009 and H.R. 1351 in 2011,
were positive legislative efforts to help address the pre-funding mandate, and
were supported by the APWU. Some, such as H.R. 2309 in 2012, were all-out
assaults on postal workers and the public Postal Service, causing the APWU to
strongly oppose them.
Regardless of the political party in power, all legislative efforts have failed
and the pre-funding crisis continues. It is clear that while Congress created
the pre-funding mess, they refuse to legislate its solution on a stand-alone
New postal reform
legislation introduced in the 115th Congress helps to solve the pre-funding
crisis and is fair to active and retired postal workers. The APWU supports two
companion bills introduced in the House of Representatives, H.R. 756 and H.R.
760. As these bills move through the legislative process, the APWU will continue
working to improve them.
We received many good questions from around the country regarding the impact of
the pending legislation, if it is passed. These questions are the basis for the
following “questions and answers.”
Q1: What is H.R. 756?
H.R. 756 is titled the “Postal Service Reform Act of 2017.” It is co-sponsored
by a number of Congressional Representatives on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the
legislative committee with jurisdiction over postal issues.
Q2: Does it have bi-partisan support of both Republicans and Democrats?
Yes. A rare sight in Washington, key Republicans and Democrats support the bill. It is sponsored by House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT). Initial co-sponsors are Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-MD), and Representatives Mark Meadows (R-NC), Gerry Connolly (D-VA), Dennis Ross (R-FL) and Stephen Lynch (D-MA). It passed the Oversight Committee made up of 24 Republicans and 18 Democrats with an overwhelming voice vote.
Q3: How does H.R. 756 address the pre-funding debacle created by the 2006 PAEA?
H.R. 756 helps to solve the crushing pre-funding burden. By lowering the cost of FEHBP with Medicare Integration, combined with introducing EGWP drug discounts, the Postal Service should be 100 percent funded to meet the requirement of the PAEA.
Q4: What are the main aspects of H.R. 756 that affect postal workers and retirees?
The bill puts the Postal Service on firmer financial footing, which should lead to positive benefits for postal workers both active and retired. It addresses the pre-funding crisis and increases postal rates to raise revenue. Aspects that will directly affect postal workers and retirees are the creation of a “postal only” health care program within the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), and the requirement of “Medicare Integration” for postal retirees who are eligible for Medicare.
Q5: If H.R. 756 becomes law, will there be any changes to what health benefits are covered?
There should be no changes in what health benefits are covered as a direct result of the passage of H.R. 756. With or without passage of the bill, FEHBP plans, with OPM approval, make changes annually to what they cover for medical procedures and prescription drugs, as well as co-pays, deductibles, networks and premiums. Those changes may increase or decrease a particular benefit. These FEHBP practices of the past will continue in the future.
Q6: What is Medicare Integration?
Medicare Integration requires that all Medicare-eligible postal retirees (age 65 or older) enroll in Medicare in order to maintain their FEHBP plan coverage in retirement. This means that all eligible retirees must be enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B and D in order to get insurance through the FEHBP. In order to simplify the enrollment procedure, all Medicare-eligible retirees will be automatically enrolled.
Q7: What do Medicare Parts A, B and D cover?
Medicare Part A covers hospitalization, Medicare Part B covers doctor/physician care and Medicare Part D covers prescription drugs.
Q8: Will this cost employees, upon retirement, additional premiums? What about retirees who are not yet 65 years of age?
Medicare Part A has no premium. Medicare Part B currently has a standard premium for new enrollees of $134.00/month. Each year, Medicare Part B premiums are set based on the Consumer Price Index, so premiums can change. There is no additional premium for Medicare Part D because it is part of a retiree’s FEHBP plan coverage. Retirees under 65 years of age are not Medicare-eligible and thus will have no additional Medicare premiums until they become Medicare-eligible.
Q9: If a postal worker is still an active employee after reaching the Medicare-eligible age of 65, will they have to enroll in Medicare Part B to maintain their FEHBP coverage?
No. Only when an employee retires does the Medicare Integration mandate apply.
Q10: Will Medicare Integration remove retirees from medical coverage under the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program?
No. H.R. 756 sets up a “postal only” group within FEHBP for active and retired postal workers. For Medicare-eligible retirees, Medicare will be the primary insurance and a FEHBP plan will be the secondary insurance. Medical and prescription bills not covered by Medicare are covered by the FEHBP plan (if the medical care or drugs are normally covered by the plan’s benefits).
Q11: Will the postal only group insurance be run by the USPS?
No. USPS management will have no more authority to run the postal only health plans than they do now. The FEHBP “postal only” plans will continue to be administered by their plan sponsors, with OPM oversight.
Q12: Will retirees have access to all the FEHBP plans that other federal employees/retirees have?
Mostly yes. Eligible plans in the “postal only” group will be ones with over 1,500 postal participants. Right now, over 30 plans would be eligible, including all of the union-sponsored FEHBP health plans. Current retirees in a FEHBP plan with under 1,500 postal participants will be “grandfathered in” and can stay with their health plan – or switch to a FEHBP postal plan.
Q13: Are “pre-1983” postal Civil Service retirees who did not contribute to Medicare covered under the provisions of H.R. 756?
Postal Service employees who retired prior to 1983 will be exempt from Medicare Integration, unless the retiree had sufficient quarters in a non-postal job, qualifying them for Medicare.
Q14: If a Medicare-eligible retiree has a spouse who is covered by an FEHBP plan, and is not yet 65 years of age, will there be a change in how the spouse gets medical coverage?
No. The spouse will be fully covered by the FEHBP plan until he or she becomes Medicare-eligible. At that point, the spouse will be required to enroll in Medicare Part B in order to maintain FEHBP coverage.
Q15: If H.R. 756 passes, what happens to a dependent under 26 years of age who is currently covered under a FEHBP plan?
No change will take place as a result of H.R. 756.
Q16: If H.R. 756 passes, will it have an effect on the FEHBP premium cost for active and retired postal workers?
Yes, it will have a positive effect. According to numerous health care actuaries, Medicare Integration will likely lead to cost savings for the FEHBP plans with three possible outcomes for both active and retired postal workers: 1) Some outright reduction in FEHBP premiums; 2) Slower growth of premium increases; and 3) increase in benefits provided. These anticipated savings are part of what makes this pending legislation fair to both active workers and retirees.
Q17: These are tumultuous times and there is much talk of doing away with and/or privatizing Medicare. If that were to happen, how would that affect our health coverage if H.R. 756 passes?
In the unlikely event of the elimination of Medicare, then there is really no Medicare Integration required of employees. Annuitants, including spouses, would maintain their FEHBP plan as their health insurance
Q18: If passed, when would the Medicare Integration provisions of the bill go into effect? How will affected retirees know the impact on their individual situation?
January 2019 is currently the proposed effective date. There is language in H.R. 756 that mandates an extensive education program for affected employees prior to Medicare Integration implementation. Furthermore, if H.R. 756 becomes law, the APWU is committed to creating its own education program.
Q19: How many of the current postal retirees will be affected by Medicare Integration if this bill were to become law?
Approximately 20 percent of Medicare-eligible postal retirees are not currently enrolled in Medicare Part B. They will be required to enroll if they wish to keep their FEHBP coverage.
Medicare Part B
Q20: Why do approximately 80 percent of APWU retirees already voluntarily enroll in Medicare Part B?
With the combined benefits of Medicare Part B and their FEHBP plan, enrolled retirees have virtually 100% medical coverage with no co-pays, deductibles, co-insurance or catastrophic limits.
Q21: If an over-65 retiree did not voluntarily enroll in Medicare Part B at age 65, what happens to the late enrollment penalty if the bill is passed?
Under current provisions of the law, there is a 10% late enrollment penalty for each year after a person became Medicare-eligible, but did not enroll. H.R. 756 waives the late enrollment penalty for Medicare Part B to allow current retirees to enroll.
Q22: Is there any financial assistance with Medicare Part B premiums for those who are already Medicare-eligible but did not previously enroll?
H.R. 756 has a transition provision for current retirees and covered family members. The USPS will pay 75 percent of the Medicare Part B premium the first year, 50 percent the second year and 25 percent the third year (only for retirees and dependents who did not enroll in Medicare Part B before the passage of H.R. 756). Furthermore, there are a number of Medicare Savings Programs (MSPs) to assist low-income beneficiaries with their Medicare Part B premiums. Eligibility and availability vary state by state.
Q23: If a disabled veteran, getting their health care coverage through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Health Benefit program, has FEHBP coverage for a spouse, will they be mandated to enroll in Medicare as well?
The way H.R. 756 is currently written, yes. However, the APWU is working to improve and clarify the language surrounding this issue.
Q24: If I have a physician who opts out of Medicare Part B, will I be forced to change my existing doctor?
No. For doctors who opt out of Medicare, which is an extremely small number (less than 1 percent), your FEHBP plan will pay towards your medical expenses as set forth in its benefits and coverage rules.
Medicare Part D
Q25: How does Medicare Integration into Part D affect my premiums?
Prescription coverage is already provided in all FEHBP plans. There is no additional Medicare Part D premium that would be paid under the bill other than the premium already paid for FEHBP coverage.
Q26: Medicare Part D has what is called a “donut hole” creating a gap in prescription drug coverage. How will this affect annuitants under H.R. 756?
Whatever Medicare Part D does not cover in the “donut hole” will be covered by a person’s FEHBP plan, if the FEHBP plan provides coverage with what is commonly referred to as a “wrap around plan.” A "wrap around plan" for Medicare Part D gives a person complete prescription coverage. The APWU Health Plan will provide prescription "wrap around" coverage in the new “postal only” group and it is anticipated that other FEHBP plans will, as well.
Q27: If my current medicine is not covered under the Medicare Part D formulary, will I lose the coverage for that particular medicine?
No. Your FEHBP “wrap around plan” will cover what is not covered by Medicare Part D, based on the FEHBP plan’s benefits. Keep in mind that FEHBP plans cover different medicines in different ways, which can change from year to year. That practice will not change as a result of H.R. 756, and employees will need to review their options carefully during Open Season.
Q28: What is the Employee Group Waiver Program (EGWP)?
The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003, the law that created Medicare Part D, also created the Employee Group Waiver Program (EGWP). It is a program that incentivizes employers to cover health benefits for their retirees by providing access to discounted drugs. Right now, the EGWP does not currently apply to the FEHBP; however, H.R. 756 would allow the “postal only” FEHBP plans access to the EGWP discounts. In turn, access to the EGWP should save the FEHBP plans, individuals and the Postal Service significant amounts of money on the cost of medications.
Q29: What is the companion bill, H.R. 760 about?
H.R. 760, the Postal Service Financial Improvement Act of 2017, allows the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefit Fund (PSRHBF) to invest up to 30 percent of its funds in a Thrift Savings Plan-like account. Currently, all PSRHBF money (approximately $50 billion) is in U.S. Treasury accounts, earning very low interest. With medical inflation running at 6-8 percent annually, the USPS loses large sums of money each year simply trying to keep up. Sensible investment approaches would allow the PSRHBF to generate more income to match medical inflation.
Q30: Why does the APWU support H.R. 756 when there is no language to restore overnight delivery standards?
The return of overnight delivery standards is an important goal of the APWU. However, pressing for it in this bill undermines its passage because neither the USPS nor the mailers agree to support this language. The reality we face is that no legislation will survive in the current political environment without the support of the four major postal unions, postal management and a significant portion of the major mailers. APWU’s effort to restore service standards will continue in other forms.
Q31: What about protection against further postal and plant closures?
If USPS finances are stabilized, there is less pressure to cut back on services. Conversely, if postal reform legislation is not passed soon, the Postal Service may look to implement further service cuts, such as eliminating delivery days, closing processing plants, reducing staffing, shuttering post offices and subcontracting more work – and services. Remember, a declining Postal Service is also an easy target for full-blown privatization.
Q32: Will H.R. 756 undermine our union rights?
No. As opposed to some “postal reform” bills over the last few years, H.R. 756, as this article goes to press, does not attack collective bargaining rights, the right to dues check-off or the right to official union time.
Q33: Different legislative initiatives over the years have attacked injured workers. How does H.R. 756 treat injured workers?
There is no change to current law.
Q34: What is the current status of the legislation?
The bills are in the early stage of a long arduous legislative process. Both have been “marked up” and approved by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Once the bills are reviewed by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) - to "score" their financial impact on the overall federal budget - and are reviewed by other committees of jurisdiction, they will advance to the full House. If the bill(s) pass the House, the process will move to the Senate.
View the original article on the APWU website.
Bipartisan Postal Reform Bill Passes Through Committee
Upon my return from our nations capital we see HR 756, the bill on postal reform,
clearing its first hurdle on its way to the house floor for a vote. The APWU at
the HQ level is preparing a Q&A to answer the many questions you will all have.
Take a look at the story below, we have attached the bills
(HR 756 and its
companion HR 760) in their entirety.
Feel free to email the local with your questions - if we can answer we will, if
not we will forward them to the legislative department for answers.
I can be emailed at firstname.lastname@example.org
As always, stay tuned...
480-481 Area Local
MPWU Legislative Dir.
Bipartisan Postal Reform Bill Passes Through Committee
WASHINGTON – Today, with a bipartisan voice vote, the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee approved H.R. 756, the Postal Service Reform Act of 2017, as amended. Upon approval, the bill’s original
cosponsors, including Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), Ranking Member Elijah E.
Cummings (D-MD), Reps. Mark Meadows (R-NC), Dennis Ross (R-FL), Gerry Connolly
(D-VA), and Stephen F. Lynch (D-MA), released the following statement:
“The Postal Service is in dire need of real reforms, and this bill puts it on
the course toward financial stability. These desperately needed policy changes
prevent a taxpayer bailout of the Postal Service and will save billions of
dollars over the next decade. We are pleased to see this bill pass through
committee and urge the House to follow suit as soon as possible.”
Click here to view a summary of the bill.
Click here to view notable changes
from legislation introduced during the 114th Congress.
The bill, first introduced January 31, 2017, addresses unfunded liabilities
of the United States Postal Service (USPS), makes reforms to keep mailing costs
affordable for consumers, and encourages innovation, all without additional
borrowing from the U.S. taxpayer. The Committee followed up on introduction in
early February with a legislative hearing on the bill and the continued need for postal reform.
In May 2016, the committee held a hearing to examine the need for
timely and comprehensive postal reform legislation. In June 2016, the committee
introduced H.R. 5714, the Postal
Service Reform Act. In July 2016, the legislation overwhelmingly passed
out of committee.
What the bill does:
Makes USPS more efficient:
- Cuts Costs: CBO Score, Unified Budget
Savings of at least $2.2B
- Streamlines and Secures Mail Delivery
through cluster boxes for eligible businesses, voluntary residential
- Strengthens Accountability by holding
Postmaster General accountable for results
- Improves Oversight by having the
Postal Regulatory Commission review postage rates, mail delivery
Keeps promises to customers, employees:
- Guarantees Pension Liability by making
clear USPS is responsible for accrued pension liabilities
- Improves Employee Health Care by
improving coordination of care through a USPS-only health care plan and Medicare
- Emphasizes Local Service Opportunities
by having USPS provide state, local, and tribal government services at local
post offices, reducing the cost of service and raising postal revenue
- Supports Rural Access by obtaining
local community input on post office closure
View the original PostalReporter.com post.
View a copy of the H.R. 756 bill here.
View a copy of the H.R. 760 bill here.
Environmental Conditions at Michigan Metroplex
Hello Brothers and sisters,
The OIG received a complaint from the APWU
in December of 2015 expressing concerns for the safety and health of employees
at the Metroplex.
The complaint mentioned the facility is located at an old General Motors site,
may be contaminated and, therefore, needs further investigation.
report is just a continuance of the investigation into the air quality and
work environment at the MI Metroplex. The APWU has remained engaged at the
local and HQ level in this process and we continue to discuss what improvements
can be made at the Metroplex to ensure we have a safe place to move our customer's
mail. As your President I have been in communication with APWU HQ and USPS
District and Plant management regarding the implementation of the
I have briefed the Maintenance Craft Director Mike Gordon as well Metroplex
Chief Steward Eric Neal, copies of this report have been sent to all members of
this local executive board and the stewards at the Metroplex.
On behalf of the 480-481 Area Local I want to thank APWU President Mark
Dimondstein, Executive VP Debby Szeredy and MVS Director Mike Foster for the
leadership as we confronted these issues. They were instrumental in getting this
issue the national attention and oversight necessary to see that the proper
reforms and repairs were made to the methane detection system in the MI
Stay tuned, once the final report is issued we will make it available for all of
you to review.
480-481 Area Local
You can view a copy of the January 25, 2017 report here:
Conditions at Michigan Metroplex Processing and Distribution Center
Outta This World Order
Hello Sisters and Brothers,
With the announced retirement of long time Communicator Editor Paul Felton the
480-481 Area Local would like to congratulate Elaine Dunlap the current Chief
Steward in Rochester and our former Maintenance Craft Director into the position
of Editor for the 480-481 Area Local Communicator. I am certain Elaine will
make us all proud. I expect Elaine will continue the tradition of strong
editorial content as well as giving us a round up of all that is happening in
the world of postal workers.
While Paul's much earned retirement brings to end an era of outstanding work
when it comes to our paper I have no doubt Elaine will continue that tradition.
Elaine has written her first editorial and since our winter edition is not due
to come out until late December I thought we could share her first article here
on our homepage.
Enjoy the read and good luck to you Brother Felton and thank you for those
decades of excellence.
480-481 Area Local
Outta This World Order
It is one week after the 2016 presidential election has come to a close. Donald
J. Trump has been elected to be the 45th President of the United States. There
is a major divide in our country at this time. Secretary Clinton won the
popular vote by over a million more votes than President elect Trump. By the
time this paper comes out we will see if the Electoral College votes to install
Trump or they throw some kind of Hail Mary pass.
Tensions are high. World leaders and American citizens are anxious about the
radical change Trump has declared he will bring to bear. Every day since the
election there have been protests around our country. There have been citizens
that support Trump, some, seemingly unconscious of the irony, waving the
Confederate Flag, telling the protesting citizens to get over it, you lost.
There are backers from all sides saying we need to come together behind our
President-elect and give him a chance to get the job done. Often I have heard
people say that if Trump fails- all of us fail. I anticipate that anyone reading
this article would want our country to prosper, not fail. I certainly do not
want it to fail.
I am heartened that the Millennials and Generation Z dove into the democratic
process with tenacity I had not seen before. Yesterday, I watched 14 year old
high school students protesting and marching in Washington DC. Gives me hope
that they will stay involved and strive to become the leaders they want to see
run this country.
I was disheartened by people that voted third and fourth party candidates as an
objection to the two party system. If you want more than a two party system, it
needs to start well before your candidate loses his/her primary. And perhaps if
Independent Bernie Sanders had held true to being an Independent instead of
running Democrat, this would no longer be a two party system. Let that sink in.
I am always dismayed by the eligible voters that do not vote. It’s hard to have
a government claim it is by and for the people when almost half of them do not
vote. We must give urgent attention to determining why this happens: is it
disinterest? Lack of time, transportation, childcare? Voter suppression?
As Americans we like to see our republic as the highest form of democracy and
one to be admired around the globe. We’ve been fighting for it and seeking to
create a more perfect union for over 200 years. Now the world is starting to
look at us like we are the crazy uncle whose stories you suffer through at
family dinner, while the others roll their eyes behind his back. Only this uncle
is armed for Armageddon. Let that sink in.
President-elect Trump has promised to be the president of all Americans, “drain
the swamp” and ‘bind the wounds of division.” Currently, President-elect Trump
is choosing his transition team and cabinet. So far they do not look like
promising outsiders or unifying leaders that he told us would bring about
positive changes. Reince Priebus as Chief of Staff? He is a Washington insider
and the chairman of the Republican National Committee. White Supremacist Steve
Bannon for Chief Strategist? At the time of this writing the Secretary of Labor
has not been named. That job is intended to protect American workers and worker
rights. But the names I see that are being considered for that position have a
history of a much greater allegiance to protect employers and not workers. To a
large chunk of society the potential cabinet and presidential appointees are
notable mostly for their racist, sexist, and homophobic views and for being
often a politically inexperienced crop of wealthy white people.
Oh yeah, and there are media reports that he wants his kids to have top secret
security clearance. Anybody else remember the audacity of First Lady Hillary
Clinton trying to shape universal healthcare in the nineties? And my goodness,
Michelle Obama telling us to exercise, wearing sleeveless dresses and showing
her arms! Arms, I am willing to bet, every woman over 50 would love to have. How
did we get from there to here? Here being where the next First Lady, Melania
Trump, has plagiarized Michelle Obama’s speeches, posed naked for a magazine and
lied for years about having a college degree. Here being where we elected a
president that bullies and brags about sexually assaulting women, makes fun of
disabled people and slews vile comments about immigrants, veterans and women.
If you haven’t figured it out by now, I did not vote for and do not look forward
to Donald Trump as our next president. He will be my president regardless of my
disdain. I love my country and honor its constitution. The constitution gives me
freedom of speech and freedom to protest and I intend to do both. I will
continue to promote and vote for the politicians that I believe have the best
interests of our postal jobs and my belief system.
I can’t speak for all postal employees, but I need this job. No matter who
postal employees voted for, we had better come together and be vigilant about
job security, wages, benefits, and safety. We had better police our elected
officials and their appointees. We better pay attention before we lose our
great gig. After all, Mr. Trump does not believe in paying his own employees.
Filling the G.A.P.S…
480-481 Area Local Field Steward Marty Jablonski has written the article below and Maintenance Craft Director Mike Gordon and me thought it important enough information to get it out to you all now.
Thanks Marty for summing it all up - as a custodian myself I believe Marty explains the importance of policing what we do ourselves on a daily basis. The work we protect is our own - management as shown time and time again they will manipulate hours to get out of paying us all what we are owed.
We must all work together to protect our work.
480-481 Area Local
Filling the G.A.P.S…
S~~ SAVING of jobs,
Attention all Maintenance Stewards, now is the time to make sure you are on the
lookout for the Line H numbers at your office to see if Management has once
again skewed your numbers so they do not owe by simply cutting your cleaning
frequencies or changing numbers.
The MS 47 specifically states, Section 110 GENERAL 111 “It is the responsibility
of the postmaster manager of a postal facility to assure that custodial
maintenance is sustained at a satisfactory level. When making staffing
determinations, management MUST make a commitment to MAINTAIN a clean and
healthful working environment. When determining what, when, and how often to
clean, this commitment must be the principal concern.
When looking at your FY16 Line H calculations, make sure you are requesting
Employee Everything Clock Rings to track your custodial hours as these we have
found are the most accurate to do actual calculations. This is also something
you want to get in the habit of keeping up on all year long as I am sure you do
with your ODL OT List. The more up to date you are the easier it will be to see
if management will owe or not and make sure your grievance, if necessary, is
You should also be anticipating a form titled, “Custodial Survey”, from the
union office, this will be a great assistance for you when you are looking over
your 4852 to make sure your custodians are getting credit for all the work they
are actually doing. Over the years management has found it easier to utilize
custodians as their catch all go to workers. For instance, Go Deliver Express,
shrink wrapping tubs, breaking down cardboard for recycling, separating plastic,
setting up rooms for conferences, parties, meetings, traveling from office to
office to run empty equipment, dropping placards in collection boxes, and many
other errands. We are not errand workers, we are custodians, with specific jobs
and tasks that we are supposed to do every day. Your job is the one they are
looking at cutting so do not believe for a minute that those favors you are
doing will stop them from cutting your position in order to avoid paying you
money at the end of the year. Now granted not all these items may be an
everyday thing but they are taking away your time to clean your building the way
it should and that management is doing everything they can to cut maintenance
hours and staffing so DO NOT HELP them CUT YOUR JOB. Make sure everything you
are doing is on the proper operation and if unsure ask them what operation you
should be swiping to. Lastly, make sure your custodial MS 47 package is correct
and current, Management has been shaving numbers off slowly and by changing
frequencies, room sizes, from active to inactive, number of tours, and jobs
actually being done. Remember if the work you do is not included in the package
and it isn’t project work then it is subtracted from the year end totals. Make
sure you get what money you deserve by protecting your job! If you are unsure
what jobs you should or should not be doing and don’t understand your package
ask your Maintenance Craft Director for assistance or call the union hall and
they will give you someone to assist you.
Know your job, Do your job, Keep your job!
480 481 Area Local Endorsements
for APWU National Elections!!
480-481 Area Local Endorsements for the election of officers for the APWU as
discussed and voted on at the September 11th, 2016 480-481 Area Local GMM. We
urge all of our membership to review these endorsements and vote for those
Mark Dimondstein (I), Greater Greensboro Area Local (NC)
Executive Vice President
Jeff Kehlert, Trenton Metro Area Local (NJ)
Industrial Relations Director
Vance Zimmerman, Greater Cincinnati Area Local (OH)
Judy Beard (I), Detroit Area District Local (MI)
Health Plan Director
John L. Marcotte (I), Gaylord Local (MI)
Research and Education Director
Charles P. Smith, Puget Sound Area Local (WA)
Clerk Craft Director
Clint Burelson (I), Olympia Local (WA)
Assistant Clerk Craft Director (B)
Lynn Pallas-Barber (I), 498-499 Area Local (MI)
Maintenance Craft Director
Steve G. "Steve" Raymer (I), Madison Area Local (WI)
Assistant Maintenance Craft Director (B)
Terry B. Martinez (I), Dallas Area Local (TX)
Motor Vehicle Service Division
National Business Agents, Central Region
William Wright, Indianapolis Area Local (IN)
Retiree Dept. Director - While the general membership cannot vote for this
position the membership at the September 11th, 2016 meeting does endorse and
urge all retirees in the APWU to vote for:
Joe Gordon, 480-481 Area Local (MI)
Additionally the members in attendance at the September 11th, 2016 meeting
approved the following contest to get out the vote in this national election:
Resolution to encourage our members to get out the vote in the 2016 APWU
National Election - Presented to the membership for vote on 9-11-16.
Whereas: The APWU is a fully democratic union that gives all members in good
standing their voice through their vote - as in one person, one vote,
Whereas: We are one of the largest Area Locals in the APWU and it is important we use
that strength to see those officers we endorse win election and hold office,
Whereas: We have spent a considerable time choosing who to endorse for this year's
2016 electin of national officers,
Therefore Be It Resolved: The 480-481 Area Local President will ask the
Chaiperson of the APWU National Election Committee Anthony "Tony"
Turner to randomly draw 20 ballots from those designated as having come from the 480-481 Area Local.
Those 20 names will be entered into a local drawing where the first 19
pulled will receive a $25.00 Visa Gift Card and the 20th name drawn will
receive a $100.00 Visa Gift Card. This drawing will take place at the
October 2016 general membership meeting.
Download a copy of the 480-481 Area Local Endorsements.
Now Available Online
Methane Detection System
The APWU is happy to post for your review a letter written by Senators Stabenow
and Peters as well as Representative Brenda Lawrence that was sent to PMG
Brennan. We are thankful for their direct involvement and oversight as we try to
make certain the USPS is providing a safe workplace for us all.
In addition we are providing for your review a request for information sent to
management by the local.
We have provided this document to APWU HQ as well as our Congressional
representatives so they are fully aware of what efforts we are taking so we can
all be certain we are working together. Recently OSHA and Great lakes Area were
in the Metroplex. I cannot tell you what exactly they were there for since no
one in Area or District bothered to tell your President that they were coming.
While we welcome OSHA’s further involvement, when we became aware of this visit
I expressed the following to Great Lakes Area Vice President:
“I have a decent working relationship with District Manager Lee Thompson but
after speaking to her about this visit and the fact we received no advance
notice we are not satisfied that management here in the Detroit District or in
the GLA understands the importance of keeping the local union looped in when we
are dealing with such serious issues. Maintenance Manager Mike Brown sought out
some union assistance once OSHA arrived and it was just luck that there was a
APWU steward available to assist. Had management contacted my office in advance
I might have come out myself to assist and make certain the membership we
represent knew we were all working together to find solutions to the problems
and perhaps that show of unity might have gone a long way to calming the fears
in the Metroplex about the working environment.
"I take my job very serious, I do my best to be respectful and to engage with
management in those processes that require a joint effort. Simply put the
employees who work in the MI Metroplex do not trust local management. Failing to
provide advanced notice of these types of visits to local union leadership shows
a disregard for our leadership in addition it further degrades the employees
trust and my leaderships trust in management with respect to this methane
We will continue to push forward and we will not be deterred from seeing the
people we represent have a safe work place.
MI Metroplex Methane Update: March 2016
Metroplex Methane Test Results, March 23rd, 2016 [PDF]
Recently there was a report posted on the internet
that dealt with a concern raised by the APWU regarding issues associated with
the Methane Detection System in place at the Pontiac MI. Metroplex. The report can be found here
After a series of work place fatalities spanning 14 months the 480-481 Area
Local of the APWU reached out to APWU HQ to discuss our concerns. Among
issues we were concerned with, excessive overtime, a tense and at times hostile
work environment, under-staffed machines as well as issues we had with the
methane detection system.
As President - First I called OSHA, then I called APWU HQ in D.C.
APWU National President Mark Dimondstein as well as Vice President Debbie
Szeredy after talking to me reached out to the OIG at the HQ level and the OIG
investigation that resulted in the report linked to above began. An OIG
investigatory team came to the Metroplex and stayed for a few days doing a
series of interviews, Chief Steward Eric Neal and I were interviewed about our
Additionally I reported on this issue at the October 480-481 Area local
Membership meeting. Attached to this update is a document that shows the results
of the methane testing that was conducted in January of 2016.
attached [PDF] notes that on the date of testing there were no immediate health or
safety concerns regarding the methane levels in the Metroplex. The report notes
that there seems to be a problem with the detection system itself.
The USPS is taking measures to see these “faults” are in fact remedied so we can
all be certain this system is working properly. The actions taken are at the
recommendation of the OIG and the oversight is from not only the OIG but all the
impacted unions and management associations.
As a side note, this testing was not done by the USPS, it was done by an
independent outside agency.
All documentation associated with this issue has been forwarded to APWU HQ. I
have had several meetings with our national leadership as well as the OIG on
this issue and I want to assure the members of the 480 481 Area local that we
are engaged in ensuring that there is no health risk associated with the air
quality at the MI Metroplex.
The investigation has yet to be completed and once it is and we have the final
report I will report to you all the results.
I want to thank the Mail Handlers Union for their leadership in this issue as
well as Senior Plant Manager Brian Fisher for providing us the documentation in
a timely manner so we can make certain the OIG’s recommendations are being
followed as well as making sure our leadership at all levels has the data.
I also want to thank our national leadership for taking swift action to see the
OIG investigated this facility and our concerns.
The contract requires that we all follow the instructions of our supervisors
unless of course those instructions could harm us or others. I want to assure
all of you that if your union thought for one second the air in the Metroplex
was a risk to your health we would be out front telling you all to stay out.
Questions or concerns please give us a call,
480-481 Area Local
Sisters and Brothers,
The article posted below sums up with a firsthand account what an utter failure
this Governor's leadership has been in dealing with this disaster that is and
remains the Flint Water Crisis. Were it not for the volunteers on the ground
getting it done who knows what the actual human cost of this man made crisis
might actually be. I too do not have the words to describe what I have seen in
just the few moments I have been there in Flint.
The one word I do come back to time and time again is shame. This should never
have happened in what I truly believe is the greatest nation on this earth.
I ask you all read the story, then call your governor - call your state Senator
and House Rep and demand they get off their butts and focus on this crisis until
it is resolved.
Contact information for all is listed below the story.
The struggle is real and it does in fact continue.
480-481 Area Local
By: Beverly Davidson, LMSW
Yesterday two of my friends and I had the honor of volunteering in Flint, MI for
a small NGO called Crossing Water. This is a volunteer organization started by
some members of the National Association of Social Workers-MI chapter. The goal
of this group is to create connections among community groups in Flint to help
serve impoverished communities who are deeply affected by the current water
crisis. What I saw was heart-breaking beyond words. And it was only one day
there. I am trying to imagine living this way and I can’t.
We came to a low-income housing complex run by the Flint Housing Commission. I
saw a case of water on people’s doorsteps that had been delivered earlier in the
day by volunteers. There was no governmental system in the complex to test
water, distribute water, or provide lead-testing to the children. This is a
complex managed essentially by HUD. Where are the government leaders?
We knocked on one door to deliver filters and water. A young man answered who
was happy to see us. “Do you have a filter?” He does, but it did not fit, so we
gave him another one which would work in his unit. I asked if he had had his
water tested, and he was not sure. He showed me the testing bottle he had from
his aunt’s house, which was on the floor of his car, but he could not find the
paperwork to go with it (which is used for tracking and data analysis). I
explained how he had to get his water tested, making sure he understood to use
unfiltered water that had been in the tap for at least 6 hours. He had no idea
he had to do this, as he had not heard that filtered water was not safe to drink
either. Children under six live with him, and they cannot drink even the
filtered water. He had no idea, no one told him, and he does not have access to
the internet to get all of the updates online. My brilliant friend had the idea
that instead of the Governor hiring PR firms to spin his reputation, perhaps he
should hire PR firms to get a coordinated message out on safety and testing to
ALL the people of Flint.
The next house four young children answered the door gleefully, as if they knew
we were delivering water to them. The little girl joyfully showed us her
newly painted nails as we talked to her young auntie who was caring for them
while their mom was at work. We explained to the aunt about how to get her
water tested, and she had no idea of the process. She at least had a filter and
we made sure she knew the kids could only drink the bottled water. Then, the
young boy strongly and sternly put out his arms for the case of water. I said,
“It’s pretty heavy, kiddo,” but he persisted with “I can do it!” I gave him the
case and he proudly held it and brought it into the apartment. All I could
think about was that this little boy should not have to be so strong and sturdy
that his little arms have to carry a case of water for his family, he should be
holding out his arms to catch a ball or grab a swing. But he was eager and
ready for water. Water he should be getting out of his tap, not out of a
Knock. knock. A young mom answers her door and we ask if she needs water or a
filter. She needed both, and I asked if there were any urgent medical issues.
She said her baby had a bad skin rash after a bath the other day, “but it’s ok,
it went away today.” NO, NO, NO, it’s not ok. In the state of Michigan in
2016, a mother should be able to joyfully give her baby a bath and trust that
her baby will be safe from skin rashes. The saddest part is that this young mom
just accepted this without much anger or question. She has learned to live in a
world that has treated her less than for so long that she readily accepts that
her home is giving her baby skin rashes.
A few doors down, a young man answers the door for his elderly male relative who
is homebound. We give him some jugs of water and ask if they have a filter.
“yea, someone came by one day and gave us one.” Did you know that you have to
change your filter regularly, like every 2 months? He yells to his relative and
asks about the filter. “no, we didn’t know that, ya got any?” So we gave him a
replacement cartridge. Did anyone tell you to test your water? “Nah, how do you
do that?” We give him a test kit, the instructions, and realized that the
water testing being done is abysmal.
A woman runs out to our car and asks if she can have some water because her
daughter is pregnant. Her apartment is not on our targeted list but of course
we will give her water. “Do I need to sign something for the water?” My
friend reassures her “No, no, you do not need to sign anything, we are not
checking anything, we just want you to have water.” She knows that her pregnant
daughter cannot drink even filtered water, but she does not know how to get her
unit tested. We give her a test kit. “We need to get our blood tested, do you
know where we can go?” I look up test sites on my Iphone, give her some
information and tell her to take care of herself and her daughter. She thanks
us profusely, and we get in our car and scream. How can this be happening?
I ask another woman if anyone from the Housing Commission has been out here.
“Nah, but we got some water delivered once by a guy in a big Budget truck.”
Good God, this crisis has been going on for 2 years and no one from Housing &
Urban Development (HUD) or the Housing Commission has been out here to educate
its residents or test the water?
Later in the afternoon we go further into the East side of Flint. The
dilapidated homes are surrounded by barren lots, old abandoned buildings, a
trailer park with gutted trailers tagged with graffiti all next to a junk yard
and old factory. One house we are trying to reach has a disabled adult who is
homebound. His dog is outside and greets us, doing his duty and barking and
protecting his home. We respect him, but then I see a person looking out the
window. We hold up some water, but no one comes out. I wonder, would I come
out and get water and a filter from a complete stranger? Would I want to show
my vulnerability and inability to perhaps walk or move, and come face to face
with a stranger who reminds me daily that I cannot drink water from my own home?
No, I do not think I would. We understand this, we understand that this dog is
not menacing, but protecting its owner, and we gently leave the cases of water
and filter on the driveway. I hope they understand we do not judge, we do not
want to cause shame. We just want them to be safe.
My friend knocks on the next door, and an elderly woman doesn’t get up but let’s
her peek in. “We are here with Crossing Water to deliver water to you.” She
does not want us to come in and really does not want us to ask any questions.
We know she is homebound, is isolated, and has cancer from the canvassing done
earlier, which is why we are there. We want to make sure she is medically ok,
has a filter and understands the risks. My friend tells her we have 3 cases of
water for her. “I only want 2.” No, really, we have three for you. “I only
want 2.” Respectfully, we leave two cases for her. And I know my friend will
never be able to get this woman’s face out of her mind. What will happen to
her? 2 cases of water does not last long.
Across the street we go and knock, knock, knock. A young mother of four races
out to greet us in her driveway. “Oh, my god, I’m so glad to see you guys, I
just had a baby 3 weeks ago and I’ve been drinking water from the tap my whole
pregnancy. I don’t have a car because someone stole the ignition out of it. I
have some water for the formula but I have to wash his bottles with the tap
water.” We give her a filter, a test kit, and extra jugs, breaking the rules of
how much water we can deliver to each house. My heart breaks. I work with
infants, I know the effects of neurotoxins during pregnancy. This baby likely
has had massive lead exposure that is yet to be discovered. This mom may have
known the risks but HAD NO CHOICE
but to use her only source of water for the last 9 months. Her older daughter
is watching us from the window. She looks sad. But is she mirroring my face?
The city was eerily quiet, with a myriad of In and Out marts, gas stations,
bars, vacant lots, run-down houses, and churches surrounding the East side. I
wondered where all the water trucks were, where the National Guard were, where
are all the governmental leaders? This city has its entire water distribution
destroyed, and all we could see were private volunteers at churches and
businesses handing out cases of bottled water to people through a make-shift
assembly line. We can go to the Middle East, bomb and destroy entire cities,
rebuild these cities, and we can’t fix this? Where are the temporary water
systems that our government could set up? Where are the military personnel and
trucks who could deliver cases of water and filters to people who have no
resources nor transportation? Folks are supposed to go to a local fire station,
pick up a filter, a test kit, some water, and then return the test kit to the
fire station for testing? That’s the plan? Seriously? In 2016, that’s the
I thought we’d see a local Command Central in an abandoned building, a church,
or a school where there was a base of operations for water testing, water
distribution, and lead testing. I thought we’d see National Guard going
door-to-door collecting water samples from each home so that accurate testing
and mapping of the city could be done in an organized and coordinated manner. I
thought we’d see Red Cross tents throughout the poorest parts of the city. What
I did see were local groups and amazing volunteers of people from churches,
social service groups, and unions meeting people in their homes so they could at
least have bottled water and filters. What I did see was good people trying to
help, perhaps restoring some kernels of hope for people who have been beaten
down. More importantly, what I did see were poor people who, instead of being
outraged at the indignity and destruction their government has created for them,
have been so disenfranchised and are so impoverished that they have been
conditioned to believe they are not worthy of even a basic human right such as
Not only does the infrastructure need to change, but so does an entire belief
system on how we treat the poor.
In the words of Hubert Humphrey, “The moral test of a government is how it
treats those who are at the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the
twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadow of life, the sick
and the needy, and the handicapped.”
In this city, in this state, our government has failed this test immeasurably.
View the original blog post.
Flint's Water Crisis
Hello Brothers and Sisters,
Our local has been receiving a lot of calls asking how people might assist the
citizens of Flint in dealing with this current water crisis.
I have done some research and if you would like to contribute directly to the
campaign to help please point and click your way to:
The United Way of Genesee County has set up this fund for the purchase of
filters, bottled water, emergency support services and prevention efforts.
100% of the fund is used for these projects and no Administrative Fee is
The UWGC has sourced more than 11,000 filters systems and 5,000 replacement
filters, ongoing sources of bottled water to the Food Bank of Eastern Michigan
and also supports a dedicated driver for daily distribution.
This is by far the best way to donate cash.
If you wish to donate water feel free to bring water to our next scheduled
general membership meeting and we will make arrangements to get it to the folks
on the ground assisting the Flint’s people.
An injury to one is an injury to all!
We can make a difference.
480-481 Area Local